Home Entertainment “Snowball” LIVE – good or bad idea? Plungeinto Soccer betting

“Snowball” LIVE – good or bad idea? Plungeinto Soccer betting

3 min read

Plungeinto Soccer betting. We give soccer results and expectations. Pick soccer league and you will discover statistics, picks, tables and data for all your betting needs. All football data on this site is free.


So I’ve thought about doing this before. I don’t know if it already has been done. The “snowball” idea is to start 10 euros and keep going all-in with the money that we win until we reach a certain number. So for example:

We bet 10 on a team > win 16
bet 16 > win 28
bet 28 > win 56

It would all be live and in the span of a short time(1-3 hours) depending on the supply.

What do you guys think about this?

Soccer Betting Guide – Reviews, Tips, Bonuses and Promotions! This soccer betting guide has been arranged to give first time and inexperienced soccer bettors and additionally any individual who is knowledgeable at putting down soccer related betting and bets a more profound understanding into the advantages and entanglements of setting any kind of soccer wager. We will be telling you how you can spot conceivably compensating wagering openings, also helping you locate the best betting site to put down your wagers with, to guarantee a you a much good betting position.

AliDropship is the best solution for drop shipping
Load More Related Articles
Load More By plugeldadmin
Load More In Entertainment


  1. BloodOfTenChiefs

    September 23, 2017 at 1:50 am

    Bad Idea in many ways.

    * Assuming that you somehow have a positive expected value for every bet. As you play many games there is a **very high variance**. (This of course is bad, as you have to do this a lot of times to earn money)

    * This is **basically playing accas**. You only get the money if you win all games. So you can easy calculate the propability by imagining the urn model with 3 balls and putting them back in, without noting the sequence. ~~If N=3 (3 outcomes) and n=5 (you pick 5 games for example) then you compute it with the binmonal coefficient of (N+n-1) and (n). You will see this comes out very low.~~ (Edit: Of course you have to divide this through the propability of finding the “win” ball times N. Thanks to /u/TheWizardOfOdds for pointing that out) The propabilities to the power of the number of games is actually way easier!

    * Biggest problem is, that even though you have a high variance you have **no edge multiplication** so this is basically even worse than accas

    * and last but not least it is never good to distribute the risk unevenly between multiple bets that have the same expected value

    Edit: This is the type of bet, where chance of ruin is immensly high, on the other hand you can win a lot of money.


  2. circlingldn

    September 23, 2017 at 1:50 am

    otherwise known as a rolling accumulator


  3. ContrarianAnalyst

    September 23, 2017 at 1:50 am

    I can guarantee that the reverse of this bankroll management approach tends to lead to epic losses, so there’s certainly some probability this will produce a big profit if you have the nerve to keep going long enough, although if you don’t have value no betting system will generate long term profit.


  4. Sir_luw

    September 23, 2017 at 1:50 am

    we all think it’s great until we lose it all then start again the next day…good luck


  5. johnnyc91

    September 23, 2017 at 1:50 am

    I’ve seen it done but divide the total by the odds of the next bet before you bet on it. This gives less risk.

    For example £10 @ 1.6 returns £16. Next bet also 1.6 so bet £10 and store £6. Returns £16 + spare £6 = £22 altogether.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

My new desk art. Boss wasn’t pleased.

My new desk art. Boss wasn’t pleased. …